AVOID BRIGHTWELLS AT ALL COSTS!
AVOID BRIGHTWELLS AT ALL COSTS!
I bought a vehicle with serious gearbox faults that were never disclosed. Despite their own Terms & Conditions (Condition 35.9 and 35.10), which say it’s the buyer’s responsibility to inspect the lot, how are you supposed to do that properly in an online auction? It’s impossible to physically inspect the vehicle beforehand, yet Brightwells refuses to verify or guarantee any information given by the seller (Condition 35.1, 35.3, 35.4).
I spoke to James at Brightwells, who admitted they only drove the car at 5mph around their site and didn’t detect the problem — but acknowledged the gearbox fault once I reported it. They then offered to relist the vehicle with the fault disclosed. This is a clear admission they sold me a car with serious mechanical defects without disclosure, which is misleading at best.
Brightwells wash their hands of any responsibility, but their own conditions show how little they verify seller info — leaving buyers to bear the full risk. This isn’t just unfair; it’s poor practice.
If you want honesty and proper buyer protection, look elsewhere. Brightwells’ process and customer care are deeply flawed.
“sold as seen” is NOT a legal get-out-of-jail-free card.
In UK law:
The Misrepresentation Act 1967 protects buyers against false or misleading statements, including omissions.
The Consumer Rights Act 2015 requires goods to be as described, of satisfactory quality, and fit for purpose.
12 giugno 2025
Non scritta su invito