Extremely Disappointing – Beware Before Engaging Roof Seal
I paid $15,000 for what Roof Seal marketed as a “premium” roof restoration at my property. Unfortunately, the experience has been deeply disappointing.
The facts:
The roof coating failed twice within months, showing bubbling, peeling, and stripping.
The job remains defective and unfit for purpose, despite being sold as a premium restoration.
I was assured no subcontractors would be used—a major selling point - but subcontractors were involved.
Work was completed in unsuitable weather conditions, despite my clear request to postpone due to rain concerns.
Communication was consistently poor: delays, unanswered emails, and repeated broken commitments.
My complaint escalated to the Managing Director. Despite this, the company refused a refund—even though these repeated failures clearly meet the definition of a major failure under Australian Consumer Law (Section 267), which gives consumers the right to reject a service.
I have lodged a formal complaint with Consumer Affairs Victoria and submitted an application to DBDRV for conciliation, seeking a full refund of $15,000 under ACL major failure provisions, due to Roof Seal’s refusal to refund - a clear violation of Australian Consumer Law.
I’m sharing these facts so others can make an informed decision. Based on my experience, exercise extreme caution before engaging Roof Seal.








