Liga Hosting SRL Recensioni 66

Very kind and helpful, even with stuff outside the scope of the paid service. Would buy again 100% !

I have a vps here and it offers stability.Thanks to their kindness.I will continue to use it.

Overall, I am satisfied with the performance of this server, but when I was practicing some commands witch form my Linux course , it occasionally experienced network instability.

Poor network infrastructure
I'm not sure about the quality and purpose of this company

I am very disappointed with this VPS provider. First of all, the server performance is extremely unstable and frequent dropouts prevent me from using it normally. Secondly, the customer service response time is slow, every time I encounter problems, I need to wait for a long time to get a solution. In addition, the prices on the website do not match the actual charges, and the hidden fees are disconcerting. Overall, this unprofessional service experience wasted my time and money. I would never recommend it to anyone who needs a reliable VPS service.

I have to be honest and say that I didn't use this vps because I couldn't use it from the beginning. I submitted a ticket and they just asked me to restart and reinstall. If I can't solve such a simple problem myself, then why do I use vps?

I'm not sure about the quality and purpose of this company, but all I can say is not to buy expensive servers from this company.

This is a review for Life Cloud Solutions, which was previously been called Liga Hosting.

I have been notified today, via email, that my free service is at jeopardy of being terminated within 30 days if I do not provide a review for their company here on Trustpilot. This was not a prior requirement for the free service, it's very disappointing that there is now a requirement, and it worries me about what they might ask for in the future. To their credit, they have stated that the review should be honest, whether that be positive or negative.

The free service I have with Life Cloud Solutions is
1 Xeon E5-2670 v2 Core
1GB RAM
10GB SSD
1Gbps Port
500GB per Month Bandwidth
Seattle, WA

Overall, the service is somewhat usable. As another free service reviewer has mentioned, there appears to be some kind of network issue that creates weird latency spikes. Although the hardware is allegedly SSD, the IO speeds more closely resemble HDD speeds. Network speed is okay, and processor power is also relatively normal.

For free, this service and it's limitations are acceptable. It may be useful for development or staging purposes, and it can be handy for testing. I wouldn't rely on this service for any important tasks as the reliability of the service and the provider are suspect. I would not be inclined to pay for this service as there are other service providers that offer more consistent and reliable services.

Here is a result of running YABS on my free service:

# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
# Yet-Another-Bench-Script #
# v2024-06-09 #
# github/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Thu Oct 24 03:59:48 PM EDT 2024

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 27 minutes
Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz
CPU cores : 1 @ 2499.964 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 960.7 MiB
Swap : 511.0 MiB
Disk : 9.2 GiB
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel : 6.1.0-26-amd64
VM Type : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP : Hostwinds LLC.
ASN : AS54290 Hostwinds LLC.
Host : Hostwinds LLC
Location : Seattle, Washington (WA)
Country : United States

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 31.65 MB/s (7.9k) | 40.85 MB/s (638)
Write | 31.69 MB/s (7.9k) | 41.12 MB/s (642)
Total | 63.35 MB/s (15.8k) | 81.98 MB/s (1.2k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 26.90 MB/s (52) | 25.23 MB/s (24)
Write | 28.87 MB/s (56) | 28.14 MB/s (27)
Total | 55.77 MB/s (108) | 53.37 MB/s (51)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ----
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | busy | 40.1 Mbits/sec | 127 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 460 Mbits/sec | 418 Mbits/sec | 149 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | busy | busy | 230 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | busy | busy | 197 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | busy | 218 Mbits/sec | 35.4 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | busy | 295 Mbits/sec | 65.5 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 135 Mbits/sec | 51.6 Mbits/sec | 175 ms

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 519
Multi Core | 487
Full Test | geekbench/v5/cpu/22995398

I have one of their (Life Cloud) free 1GB/10GB VPS instances. I've been idling it for about a month now. It's ok-ish. They've recently added a trustpilot review requirement to keep the free server (hence this review). Interactively, it feels sluggish, as though the network latency isn't stable. munin isn't showing a lot of CPU steal or iowait, so I'm not sure why interactive use is so unpleasant. It's not had a lot of downtime, although it does appear to have been rebooted a few times. Ok for free, might be ok for $1/month if you have no better options, but I wouldn't give $2/month for it.

life cloud VPS (104.168.128.XXX) -> home 2024-10-24T16:18:59+0000
Packets Pings
Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. client-104-168-128-XXX.hostwindsdns.com 31.8% 107 79.9 106.1 0.5 1217. 233.9
2. xe-2-2-3.mpr2.sea1.us.zip.zayo.com 35.5% 107 0.9 97.5 0.9 1094. 215.0
3. ae27.cs2.sea1.us.eth.zayo.com 41.1% 107 35.4 72.7 0.8 964.3 187.0
4. (waiting for reply)
5. ae18.edge6.sea1.sp.lumen.tech 32.7% 107 2.2 109.4 1.1 1084. 213.0
6. ae1.3.bar1.Tulsa2.net.lumen.tech 32.1% 106 53.3 187.9 48.0 1550. 302.0
7. XXX.X.X.XX 31.1% 106 64.6 190.3 64.2 1422. 273.8

YABS:
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
# Yet-Another-Bench-Script #
# v2024-06-09 #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Tue 22 Oct 2024 01:41:35 AM UTC

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime : 2 days, 3 hours, 24 minutes
Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz
CPU cores : 1 @ 2499.964 MHz
AES-NI : ? Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ? Enabled
RAM : 979.0 MiB
Swap : 511.0 MiB
Disk : 9.2 GiB
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Kernel : 5.10.0-33-cloud-amd64
VM Type : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ? Online / ? Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP : Hostwinds LLC.
ASN : AS54290 Hostwinds LLC.
Host : Hostwinds LLC
Location : Seattle, Washington (WA)
Country : United States

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 31.92 MB/s (7.9k) | 137.13 MB/s (2.1k)
Write | 31.95 MB/s (7.9k) | 137.85 MB/s (2.1k)
Total | 63.87 MB/s (15.9k) | 274.98 MB/s (4.2k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 167.62 MB/s (327) | 177.86 MB/s (173)
Write | 176.53 MB/s (344) | 189.70 MB/s (185)
Total | 344.16 MB/s (671) | 367.56 MB/s (358)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ----
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | busy | 22.8 Mbits/sec | 128 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | busy | 328 Mbits/sec | 148 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | busy | 27.8 Mbits/sec | 236 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 4.93 Kbits/sec | 60.3 Mbits/sec | 204 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | busy | 189 Mbits/sec | 27.1 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 183 Mbits/sec | 146 Mbits/sec | 129 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 38.9 Mbits/sec | 56.8 Mbits/sec | 266 ms

Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 2450
Multi Core | 2309

YABS completed in 13 min 3 sec

Here's an mtr from Crunchbits in the pacific northwest. Notice how the network latency spread is from 11.9 to 1000 ms, and the std dev is 200 ms. Something weird with their network for sure!

Crunchbits VPS (38.175.XX.XX) -> Life Cloud free VPS (104.168.128.XXX) 2024-10-24T16:22:06+0000
Packets Pings
Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. irb-1110.edge1.lblkwa.crunchbits.net 0.0% 61 0.4 1.0 0.3 12.5 2.1
2. six2.hostwindsdns.com 0.0% 61 11.8 12.0 11.4 17.8 1.2
3. client-104-168-128-XXX.hostwindsdns.com 25.0% 60 50.6 96.7 11.9 1030. 205.0

The vps is very good.

i get services from ligahosting.ro more then 6 month , every time help me , have good services with great support.

I rented several servers from them. Two of the servers became completely unusable before the due date for payment, and two others were never delivered to me. Given the undelivered services, they effectively owe me about £700.
After waiting for several months, around two months ago, they compensated me with an independent server from Velia, a 7950X, saying it was a one-year compensation for my troubles. However, this compensated server became completely unresponsive in less than half a month.
They wrongfully attributed attack records from the IP address of that server, which was used over a year ago, to me. Since then, they have ignored me and not resolved the issue.
To summarize: I haven't done anything wrong; I've shown plenty of patience, but I have been treated unfairly and have incurred significant losses.

I’m using a VPS from Life Cloud, which operates through the Hostwinds datacenter, and I’m extremely satisfied with its performance. The speed is outstanding, and the datacenter connection is fast and stable. I haven’t experienced any downtime, and Life Cloud’s technical support is prompt and professional. I highly recommend their services!

Nice provider
The tickets were replied promptly and the founder is nice to talk. The offer is unbeatable.

卓越优秀的硬件搭配非常好的价格，简直太棒了

The company provides very cheap servers with large storage, which are worth buying, and hope to continue to provide services to everyone.