Aiprimetech Recensioni 

I used AI Prime Tech to connect Claude Code through an API proxy for my development project. The dashboard makes it easy to check usage, remaining balance, request count, and costs.

The initial setup required configuring the proxy URL and API key, but once everything was connected, Claude Code worked reliably. It has been useful for code analysis, editing, and server-related development tasks.

So far, my experience has been positive. I especially like the clear usage dashboard and the ability to access different AI models through one service.

excellent, the best

Great claude provider. Compatible with opencode

Nice experience, Recommended

I bought a "Claude API Key 100 USD" on G2A (order #92000157851354) from this company's seller account. The listing described access to Anthropic's Claude API and never mentioned aiprimetech.io at all. What you actually get is a key for aiprimetech.io — a third-party proxy that requires you to redirect your API traffic to their servers. It is not an Anthropic key and the site has no affiliation with Anthropic.

When I asked for a refund because the third-party requirement was never disclosed, the seller wrote, in writing: "We can refund you; No problem but you have to give us a positive rating because refunding cost us some fee." Conditioning a refund on a positive review speaks for itself.

Other things anyone should check before trusting this site: the "Refund Policy" and "Privacy Policy" links in their footer lead to completely empty pages; the domain was registered in April 2026 behind a privacy shield; and they advertise Claude at "80% off official pricing" while claiming to route through "legitimate upstream channels" — Anthropic has no such reseller program. They also promise "zero data retention" on your prompts, with no published privacy policy to back it. Since all your AI traffic (prompts included) flows through their servers, that should worry you.

In my opinion this operation is deceptive from listing to refund. Avoid, and if you already paid, dispute it through the marketplace or your payment provider.

Update - July 6th 2026: The seller's reply contradicts documented facts and itself, so let me address it point by point.
"The listing was written by G2A, not us. Not a single word was authored by AI Prime Tech." — The G2A listing is a sponsored advertisement labeled, in G2A's own ad-disclosure panel: "Presented on behalf of: AI Prime Tech. Paid for by: AI Prime Tech." They paid to promote the very description they now disown. Their own homepage is titled "Buy Claude API Key" — the framing I objected to is their marketing, not G2A's.
Then, a few sentences later: "the product was delivered as described and was functioning correctly, we were not obligated to issue a refund." Described by what? By the description of which "not a single word" is theirs. These two statements cannot coexist. If they didn't write the description and don't control it, they cannot invoke it as the standard their delivery met. They disclaim the listing when it's accused of being misleading, and rely on it when refusing a refund — in the same reply. Either the description is theirs and it concealed the third-party requirement, or it isn't theirs and "delivered as described" means nothing. Both ways, the refund was justified — and a seller who publicly states they have no control over the accuracy of their own listing is telling every buyer the listing cannot be relied upon.
"Your claims are speculative because you never used the API." — Nothing in my review requires using the API. The empty policy pages are verifiable by anyone with a browser. The domain registration date (April 2026) is public WHOIS data. The undisclosed third-party requirement comes from their own post-purchase instructions. The refund condition is their own written message.
"Refund and Privacy policies have always existed; only the footer links were broken, which has since been fixed." — As of today, July 6th 2026, both aiprimetech*io/refund and aiprimetech*io/privacy still load as empty pages. And "the links were broken" concedes exactly what I reported. A refund policy readable only after creating an account is not a published refund policy — consumers must be able to see terms before paying.
"We were not obligated to refund, but we were willing to make an exception." — What they omit is the condition attached to that "exception." Their exact written words: "We can refund you; No problem but you have to give us a positive rating because refunding cost us some fee." They have not denied writing this. It remains the core of my review.
"Direct your concerns to G2A." — My concern is with the G2A seller account "Aiprimetech," which is this company, in a dispute conversation with this company, about an ad paid for by this company.
Every statement above is backed by screenshots and public records. My rating stands.

Great service every time, I keep coming back to buy more. Thank you!

Really good the service is working well, and the Api is also good can use all the models. Thank you.